Find the risk. Understand the impact.

Authorized, scoped security assessments for applications, APIs, and the infrastructure around them. Technical depth, business context, and findings your engineers can use.

Discuss your project

You need an independent assessment before launch, as part of a customer’s security review, or after a significant change. We establish the scope and produce findings your engineers can act on.

How we help.

Carefully scoped application and API assessments, manually validated findings, and a clear path to remediation.

01

Application & API assessments

Assess application behavior, authentication, access controls, and sensitive business workflows within an agreed scope.

02

Source & architecture context

Use available source code and architecture information to improve coverage and connect findings to their underlying causes.

03

Application infrastructure review

Assess the cloud and infrastructure controls supporting the application where they are explicitly included in the engagement.

04

Remediation & retesting

Discuss findings with your engineers and agree on a retest scope to verify corrective changes.

A report your engineers can act on.

Every engagement starts with written authorization, agreed boundaries, and rules of engagement. Findings are manually validated and explained in business context. Automated tools support the assessment; they do not replace engineering judgment.

Clear from start to finish.

For your engineering teamExplore the technical approachImplementation considerations, tools, and example deliverables.

Coverage that reflects the application.

The assessment plan connects the agreed scope to the system’s roles, workflows, data sensitivity, and architecture.

Explicit coverage

Document the applications, APIs, roles, environments, and exclusions being assessed. Include source and architecture context where available to make coverage and limitations clear.

Example deliverable

Scope and coverage matrix

Findings in context

Validate findings within the agreed rules of engagement. Explain the affected control, supporting evidence, and business consequences, with severity informed by context as well as technical scoring.

Example deliverable

Evidence-backed findings and remediation priorities

A usable engineering handover

Connect each finding to a practical fix and a clear validation criterion. Record the outcome of agreed retesting and identify any remaining limitations or unresolved issues.

Example deliverable

Remediation guidance and retest disposition

Tools & approaches
OWASP WSTG / ASVS · OWASP API Security · Manual validation · Contextual severity assessment

Plan your next
engineering initiative.

Tell us about your objectives, current systems, and constraints. We’ll discuss the scope, deliverables, and engagement that fit.

Discuss a project