Application & API assessments
Assess application behavior, authentication, access controls, and sensitive business workflows within an agreed scope.
Authorized, scoped security assessments for applications, APIs, and the infrastructure around them. Technical depth, business context, and findings your engineers can use.
Discuss your projectYou need an independent assessment before launch, as part of a customer’s security review, or after a significant change. We establish the scope and produce findings your engineers can act on.
Carefully scoped application and API assessments, manually validated findings, and a clear path to remediation.
Assess application behavior, authentication, access controls, and sensitive business workflows within an agreed scope.
Use available source code and architecture information to improve coverage and connect findings to their underlying causes.
Assess the cloud and infrastructure controls supporting the application where they are explicitly included in the engagement.
Discuss findings with your engineers and agree on a retest scope to verify corrective changes.
Every engagement starts with written authorization, agreed boundaries, and rules of engagement. Findings are manually validated and explained in business context. Automated tools support the assessment; they do not replace engineering judgment.
Agree on assets, access, timing, exclusions, and rules of engagement before testing begins.
Review the application and its context, using manual validation to establish meaningful findings.
Explain the evidence, affected boundaries, business impact, and practical remediation options.
Walk through the findings with your engineers and verify fixes within the agreed retest scope.
The assessment plan connects the agreed scope to the system’s roles, workflows, data sensitivity, and architecture.
Document the applications, APIs, roles, environments, and exclusions being assessed. Include source and architecture context where available to make coverage and limitations clear.
Scope and coverage matrix
Validate findings within the agreed rules of engagement. Explain the affected control, supporting evidence, and business consequences, with severity informed by context as well as technical scoring.
Evidence-backed findings and remediation priorities
Connect each finding to a practical fix and a clear validation criterion. Record the outcome of agreed retesting and identify any remaining limitations or unresolved issues.
Remediation guidance and retest disposition
Tell us about your objectives, current systems, and constraints. We’ll discuss the scope, deliverables, and engagement that fit.
Discuss a project